Compare audio representation models using benchmark results
Browse and submit model evaluations in LLM benchmarks
Generate leaderboard comparing DNA models
Optimize and train foundation models using IBM's FMS
Browse and submit LLM evaluations
Convert Stable Diffusion checkpoint to Diffusers and open a PR
Evaluate code generation with diverse feedback types
Browse and filter machine learning models by category and modality
Visualize model performance on function calling tasks
Generate and view leaderboard for LLM evaluations
Evaluate AI-generated results for accuracy
Find and download models from Hugging Face
Measure execution times of BERT models using WebGPU and WASM
ARCH is a tool designed for comparing audio representation models using benchmark results. It provides a comprehensive platform to evaluate and analyze different audio models against various benchmarks. ARCH is particularly useful for researchers and developers working in audio processing and machine learning fields.
• Support for multiple audio representation models: Including waveform, spectrogram, and other advanced models.
• Pre-defined benchmark datasets: Users can evaluate models on common audio tasks.
• Visualization tools: Generate plots and charts to compare model performance.
• Model zoo: Access pre-trained models for quick comparison.
• Customizable evaluation: Define specific metrics and benchmarks for tailored analysis.
pip install arch-benchmark
from arch import benchmark
results = benchmark.run(models, dataset='urbansound8k')
benchmark.visualize(results, save_path='results_plot.png')
What models are supported by ARCH?
ARCH supports a variety of pre-trained audio representation models, including popular ones like VGG Sound, PANNs, and OpenL3. Custom models can also be integrated for comparison.
Can I use my own dataset for benchmarking?
Yes, ARCH allows users to use custom datasets. Simply specify the dataset path and configuration when running the benchmark script.
How do I interpret the benchmark results?
Benchmark results are provided in a structured format, including metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and inference time. Use the visualization tools to generate plots that help compare model performance effectively.