Compare audio representation models using benchmark results
Measure over-refusal in LLMs using OR-Bench
Submit deepfake detection models for evaluation
Upload a machine learning model to Hugging Face Hub
Convert and upload model files for Stable Diffusion
Visualize model performance on function calling tasks
Compare LLM performance across benchmarks
Search for model performance across languages and benchmarks
Browse and filter ML model leaderboard data
Explore and submit models using the LLM Leaderboard
Compare code model performance on benchmarks
Analyze model errors with interactive pages
Track, rank and evaluate open LLMs and chatbots
ARCH is a tool designed for comparing audio representation models using benchmark results. It provides a comprehensive platform to evaluate and analyze different audio models against various benchmarks. ARCH is particularly useful for researchers and developers working in audio processing and machine learning fields.
• Support for multiple audio representation models: Including waveform, spectrogram, and other advanced models.
• Pre-defined benchmark datasets: Users can evaluate models on common audio tasks.
• Visualization tools: Generate plots and charts to compare model performance.
• Model zoo: Access pre-trained models for quick comparison.
• Customizable evaluation: Define specific metrics and benchmarks for tailored analysis.
pip install arch-benchmark
from arch import benchmark
results = benchmark.run(models, dataset='urbansound8k')
benchmark.visualize(results, save_path='results_plot.png')
What models are supported by ARCH?
ARCH supports a variety of pre-trained audio representation models, including popular ones like VGG Sound, PANNs, and OpenL3. Custom models can also be integrated for comparison.
Can I use my own dataset for benchmarking?
Yes, ARCH allows users to use custom datasets. Simply specify the dataset path and configuration when running the benchmark script.
How do I interpret the benchmark results?
Benchmark results are provided in a structured format, including metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and inference time. Use the visualization tools to generate plots that help compare model performance effectively.