Compare audio representation models using benchmark results
Measure execution times of BERT models using WebGPU and WASM
Calculate memory usage for LLM models
Display leaderboard of language model evaluations
Evaluate open LLMs in the languages of LATAM and Spain.
Evaluate and submit AI model results for Frugal AI Challenge
Predict customer churn based on input details
Measure over-refusal in LLMs using OR-Bench
Evaluate model predictions with TruLens
Display leaderboard for earthquake intent classification models
Quantize a model for faster inference
Persian Text Embedding Benchmark
Find and download models from Hugging Face
ARCH is a tool designed for comparing audio representation models using benchmark results. It provides a comprehensive platform to evaluate and analyze different audio models against various benchmarks. ARCH is particularly useful for researchers and developers working in audio processing and machine learning fields.
• Support for multiple audio representation models: Including waveform, spectrogram, and other advanced models.
• Pre-defined benchmark datasets: Users can evaluate models on common audio tasks.
• Visualization tools: Generate plots and charts to compare model performance.
• Model zoo: Access pre-trained models for quick comparison.
• Customizable evaluation: Define specific metrics and benchmarks for tailored analysis.
pip install arch-benchmark
from arch import benchmark
results = benchmark.run(models, dataset='urbansound8k')
benchmark.visualize(results, save_path='results_plot.png')
What models are supported by ARCH?
ARCH supports a variety of pre-trained audio representation models, including popular ones like VGG Sound, PANNs, and OpenL3. Custom models can also be integrated for comparison.
Can I use my own dataset for benchmarking?
Yes, ARCH allows users to use custom datasets. Simply specify the dataset path and configuration when running the benchmark script.
How do I interpret the benchmark results?
Benchmark results are provided in a structured format, including metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and inference time. Use the visualization tools to generate plots that help compare model performance effectively.