Compare audio representation models using benchmark results
Optimize and train foundation models using IBM's FMS
Predict customer churn based on input details
View RL Benchmark Reports
Calculate VRAM requirements for LLM models
Benchmark LLMs in accuracy and translation across languages
Convert Hugging Face model repo to Safetensors
Merge Lora adapters with a base model
Calculate survival probability based on passenger details
Evaluate code generation with diverse feedback types
Explore and manage STM32 ML models with the STM32AI Model Zoo dashboard
View and submit machine learning model evaluations
Browse and filter machine learning models by category and modality
ARCH is a tool designed for comparing audio representation models using benchmark results. It provides a comprehensive platform to evaluate and analyze different audio models against various benchmarks. ARCH is particularly useful for researchers and developers working in audio processing and machine learning fields.
• Support for multiple audio representation models: Including waveform, spectrogram, and other advanced models.
• Pre-defined benchmark datasets: Users can evaluate models on common audio tasks.
• Visualization tools: Generate plots and charts to compare model performance.
• Model zoo: Access pre-trained models for quick comparison.
• Customizable evaluation: Define specific metrics and benchmarks for tailored analysis.
pip install arch-benchmark
from arch import benchmark
results = benchmark.run(models, dataset='urbansound8k')
benchmark.visualize(results, save_path='results_plot.png')
What models are supported by ARCH?
ARCH supports a variety of pre-trained audio representation models, including popular ones like VGG Sound, PANNs, and OpenL3. Custom models can also be integrated for comparison.
Can I use my own dataset for benchmarking?
Yes, ARCH allows users to use custom datasets. Simply specify the dataset path and configuration when running the benchmark script.
How do I interpret the benchmark results?
Benchmark results are provided in a structured format, including metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and inference time. Use the visualization tools to generate plots that help compare model performance effectively.