Compare audio representation models using benchmark results
Track, rank and evaluate open LLMs and chatbots
Display benchmark results
Browse and submit model evaluations in LLM benchmarks
Convert a Stable Diffusion XL checkpoint to Diffusers and open a PR
Evaluate AI-generated results for accuracy
Persian Text Embedding Benchmark
Generate leaderboard comparing DNA models
Display leaderboard for earthquake intent classification models
Evaluate reward models for math reasoning
Pergel: A Unified Benchmark for Evaluating Turkish LLMs
Submit models for evaluation and view leaderboard
View LLM Performance Leaderboard
ARCH is a tool designed for comparing audio representation models using benchmark results. It provides a comprehensive platform to evaluate and analyze different audio models against various benchmarks. ARCH is particularly useful for researchers and developers working in audio processing and machine learning fields.
• Support for multiple audio representation models: Including waveform, spectrogram, and other advanced models.
• Pre-defined benchmark datasets: Users can evaluate models on common audio tasks.
• Visualization tools: Generate plots and charts to compare model performance.
• Model zoo: Access pre-trained models for quick comparison.
• Customizable evaluation: Define specific metrics and benchmarks for tailored analysis.
pip install arch-benchmark
from arch import benchmark
results = benchmark.run(models, dataset='urbansound8k')
benchmark.visualize(results, save_path='results_plot.png')
What models are supported by ARCH?
ARCH supports a variety of pre-trained audio representation models, including popular ones like VGG Sound, PANNs, and OpenL3. Custom models can also be integrated for comparison.
Can I use my own dataset for benchmarking?
Yes, ARCH allows users to use custom datasets. Simply specify the dataset path and configuration when running the benchmark script.
How do I interpret the benchmark results?
Benchmark results are provided in a structured format, including metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and inference time. Use the visualization tools to generate plots that help compare model performance effectively.