Compare audio representation models using benchmark results
Display and submit LLM benchmarks
Display leaderboard of language model evaluations
Evaluate AI-generated results for accuracy
Submit deepfake detection models for evaluation
Benchmark LLMs in accuracy and translation across languages
Push a ML model to Hugging Face Hub
Analyze model errors with interactive pages
Calculate memory needed to train AI models
View and submit LLM benchmark evaluations
Search for model performance across languages and benchmarks
View and submit machine learning model evaluations
Determine GPU requirements for large language models
ARCH is a tool designed for comparing audio representation models using benchmark results. It provides a comprehensive platform to evaluate and analyze different audio models against various benchmarks. ARCH is particularly useful for researchers and developers working in audio processing and machine learning fields.
• Support for multiple audio representation models: Including waveform, spectrogram, and other advanced models.
• Pre-defined benchmark datasets: Users can evaluate models on common audio tasks.
• Visualization tools: Generate plots and charts to compare model performance.
• Model zoo: Access pre-trained models for quick comparison.
• Customizable evaluation: Define specific metrics and benchmarks for tailored analysis.
pip install arch-benchmark
from arch import benchmark
results = benchmark.run(models, dataset='urbansound8k')
benchmark.visualize(results, save_path='results_plot.png')
What models are supported by ARCH?
ARCH supports a variety of pre-trained audio representation models, including popular ones like VGG Sound, PANNs, and OpenL3. Custom models can also be integrated for comparison.
Can I use my own dataset for benchmarking?
Yes, ARCH allows users to use custom datasets. Simply specify the dataset path and configuration when running the benchmark script.
How do I interpret the benchmark results?
Benchmark results are provided in a structured format, including metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and inference time. Use the visualization tools to generate plots that help compare model performance effectively.