Compare audio representation models using benchmark results
Track, rank and evaluate open LLMs and chatbots
Display LLM benchmark leaderboard and info
Explore and manage STM32 ML models with the STM32AI Model Zoo dashboard
Rank machines based on LLaMA 7B v2 benchmark results
Browse and filter machine learning models by category and modality
Merge machine learning models using a YAML configuration file
Merge Lora adapters with a base model
Convert Hugging Face model repo to Safetensors
Evaluate model predictions with TruLens
Browse and filter ML model leaderboard data
Calculate memory usage for LLM models
Retrain models for new data at edge devices
ARCH is a tool designed for comparing audio representation models using benchmark results. It provides a comprehensive platform to evaluate and analyze different audio models against various benchmarks. ARCH is particularly useful for researchers and developers working in audio processing and machine learning fields.
• Support for multiple audio representation models: Including waveform, spectrogram, and other advanced models.
• Pre-defined benchmark datasets: Users can evaluate models on common audio tasks.
• Visualization tools: Generate plots and charts to compare model performance.
• Model zoo: Access pre-trained models for quick comparison.
• Customizable evaluation: Define specific metrics and benchmarks for tailored analysis.
pip install arch-benchmark
from arch import benchmark
results = benchmark.run(models, dataset='urbansound8k')
benchmark.visualize(results, save_path='results_plot.png')
What models are supported by ARCH?
ARCH supports a variety of pre-trained audio representation models, including popular ones like VGG Sound, PANNs, and OpenL3. Custom models can also be integrated for comparison.
Can I use my own dataset for benchmarking?
Yes, ARCH allows users to use custom datasets. Simply specify the dataset path and configuration when running the benchmark script.
How do I interpret the benchmark results?
Benchmark results are provided in a structured format, including metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and inference time. Use the visualization tools to generate plots that help compare model performance effectively.