Compare audio representation models using benchmark results
Measure over-refusal in LLMs using OR-Bench
Calculate GPU requirements for running LLMs
Create and upload a Hugging Face model card
Evaluate adversarial robustness using generative models
Text-To-Speech (TTS) Evaluation using objective metrics.
Convert PyTorch models to waifu2x-ios format
GIFT-Eval: A Benchmark for General Time Series Forecasting
Request model evaluation on COCO val 2017 dataset
Load AI models and prepare your space
Evaluate and submit AI model results for Frugal AI Challenge
Measure execution times of BERT models using WebGPU and WASM
View and submit LLM benchmark evaluations
ARCH is a tool designed for comparing audio representation models using benchmark results. It provides a comprehensive platform to evaluate and analyze different audio models against various benchmarks. ARCH is particularly useful for researchers and developers working in audio processing and machine learning fields.
• Support for multiple audio representation models: Including waveform, spectrogram, and other advanced models.
• Pre-defined benchmark datasets: Users can evaluate models on common audio tasks.
• Visualization tools: Generate plots and charts to compare model performance.
• Model zoo: Access pre-trained models for quick comparison.
• Customizable evaluation: Define specific metrics and benchmarks for tailored analysis.
pip install arch-benchmark
from arch import benchmark
results = benchmark.run(models, dataset='urbansound8k')
benchmark.visualize(results, save_path='results_plot.png')
What models are supported by ARCH?
ARCH supports a variety of pre-trained audio representation models, including popular ones like VGG Sound, PANNs, and OpenL3. Custom models can also be integrated for comparison.
Can I use my own dataset for benchmarking?
Yes, ARCH allows users to use custom datasets. Simply specify the dataset path and configuration when running the benchmark script.
How do I interpret the benchmark results?
Benchmark results are provided in a structured format, including metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and inference time. Use the visualization tools to generate plots that help compare model performance effectively.